Creativity is a pretty difficult concept to define, and even harder to make happen. It can be difficult for producers—whose days are filled with financing, logistics, planning and schedules—to remember that they are creatives too.

But, at the end of the day, it’s the producer who is ultimately responsible for the creative integrity of their project. Here, producers and industry executives share their wisdom on creative producing: what it means and how to nurture a vision, whether it’s your creative team’s or your own.

Erin Haskett

Executive Producer and President, Lark Productions

“A great creative producer helps hold the big picture together. We support and elevate the showrunner’s vision, often collaborating with and understanding the network’s reactions to creative choices. We can be a sounding board or help make final decisions. Whether it’s digging into story and script with the writer, supporting an incoming director to better understand style choices that work for a particular show, weighing in on wardrobe as it impacts character or the palette of the show, listening to music cues to guide the pace of a scene—there are many others who lead these things as their particular expertise, but creative producers hold space for it all.

This is a collaborative medium, and the best ideas win, especially when presented respectfully, thoughtfully, and with the intention of elevating the story.”

Damon D’Oliveira

Conquering Lion Pictures

“Recognize that every filmmaker you work with is different, and each creator has their own unique approach or style of expression. A savvy creative producer has to be flexible and adjust their approach in order to facilitate the best from their collaborators.

Excessive self-censorship or overthinking will stifle a story every time. When writers constantly second-guess themselves, worry too much about what others might think, or try to conform to perceived expectations, it can paralyze creativity.”

Anthony Q. Farrell

President, Canfro Productions

“I think a great creative producer is someone who actively supports a creative team in their efforts to bring their vision to life. It takes a deep understanding of character and story, as well as a selfless attitude. You should be empathetic to the creatives you’re working with, but also be aware of the needs of your broadcast partners. Excellent communication skills are a must.

Most writers cringe at the words ‘creative producer,’ because there is always a chance that the CP feels like their vision is the most important one. When that struggle for control happens, it not only kills creativity, but it also kills relationships. The best CPs I’ve worked with have all worked hard to understand my vision and find ways to support it. As a creative producer myself now, I always let the creative team know that I am there to support them and give them any tools in my power to help them tell their story, their way.”

Tara Woodbury

Director, Content – Canada, Netflix

“Creative producers are so integral because they are the conduit to everything. They are given the huge task of holding a creative vision together while considering practical challenges and serving a network’s needs. And their job is to deliver the best execution of a project while juggling a million things. To do this, they must have great communication and transparency, have a high creative bar, be a passionate and rabid fan of stories, and be a tremendous problem solver. We find producers are most successful working with us when they bring curiosity and passion.”

Brent Haynes

Head of International Originals, Canada, Amazon MGM Studios

“A truly great creative producer is a superhuman who can see the forest for the trees. What is the big picture? How do all the parts serve the vision? How are logistical obstacles overcome creatively? And tell a compelling story while you’re at it.”

Lea Marin

Director of Development, Drama, CBC

A great creative producer recognizes the importance of the development of a good idea into a great story and will stop at nothing to protect this process and realize the vision for the project. In addition to strong creative instincts, they are often persuasive communicators with incredible organizational and people management skills.

“I think one of the best things a producer can do is to continually ask questions that clarify the creative team’s intention and vision. Often these questions will zoom into fleshing out the details and structure of a treatment, but it’s also important to continually ask what the story is ultimately about. What do you want audiences to feel and/or take away after they’ve watched your project?”

“I’ve been travelling around the country a lot in the last couple years, and specifically to smaller, more regional communities, and I feel really excited and optimistic about all of the amazing projects and stories that are out there.”

Sarah Spring

Canada’s community of documentary filmmakers is a tight-knit family—and, like any family, is liable to hit a rocky patch now and then. With recent declines in the production of feature-length documentaries; public challenges facing Canada’s marquee documentary festival, Hot Docs; and streamers appearing to be less interested in documentary commissioning, its current patch is rockier than most.

But in our interview with Sarah Spring, head of DOC, she shares how robust cultural policy and the “scrappy, survivalist” spirit of documentary filmmakers make her optimistic about the future of the genre.

In your experience, what sets Canadian documentaries apart?

In Canada, we’ve had the benefit of a robust public funding system that has nurtured people’s careers over many, many films. And that leads to this community of professional documentary filmmakers—people who have the time to think deeply about what it means to be ethically rooted in documentary storytelling.

I talk a lot about the development of a Canadian cinematic language for documentary film. And I think that that language is rooted in people deeply reflecting on, thinking about, and caring about the stories they’re telling and having the time and the space to do so. That’s made possible by this network of support that we’re really lucky to have.

DOC’s last Getting Real report [an economic profile of Canada’s documentary industry] was released in 2023. How have feature documentaries been faring?

The last report showed a really drastic drop in feature documentary production in Canada. The majority of Canadian documentary production in Canada is now low-budget documentary series.

I know that CMPA’s Profile economic report shows enormous increases in documentary production, and until this last report, Getting Real has never differentiated between formats of the genre. So this is what I was really interested in honing in on. Filmmakers across the country were telling me for the last couple of years that broadcasters are asking for low-budget series. We now have data to support that. Documentary production of feature films dropped really drastically; what was increasing was low-budget series.

So that was an alarm bell. If we leave the cultural policy up to market interest, what they’re really looking at is: what’s the payout today? How is this going to benefit my network in the next week? In the next month? And documentaries have a long-term payoff. They’re never going to compete with Big Brother in the short term, but in 10 years, they’re still going to be gathering audiences.

When we’re talking about documentary success, we need to talk about it in terms of a payoff that will benefit Canadians for many years. It’s difficult for a broadcaster, who has all of these really intense economic pressures every day, to think about that, because they’re trying to survive against Netflix. The defenders of the documentary genre are struggling to survive against these massive American streaming giants, and everyone’s watching their content on the same screen. If we don’t have rules around it, then documentary literally will disappear.

Valerie Creighton, CEO of the Canada Media Fund, announced at Prime Time in February that documentaries would be a major focus for the organization. Any updates since then?

It was a very exciting Prime Time! The changes that the CMF has made since then were a sort of quiet revolution in the documentary sector—and I feel like I’m not overstating it.

Every year, DOC, like the CMPA and many others, communicates to the CMF all the ways we think they need to change how the programs are administered and performance envelopes are administered. And this year, they followed through on almost every single recommendation that DOC put forward.

These changes are going to powerfully impact people’s ability to run their productions in a sustainable way. The CMF made tweaks to ensure that broadcasters, within the money they put toward documentary, put a fixed amount toward long-form docs. They can’t put it all toward series. And they’ve also made important changes to the way they’re running the POV Fund, the special fund for author-driven long-form documentaries. They understand that it’s really difficult to get broadcasters on board for the POV Fund, so they’re opening it up to have combinations of distributor money in there. So, I think the documentary community really feels heard.

In light of its recent financial challenges and restructuring, what’s the enduring significance of Hot Docs?

You really can’t overstate its significance. It’s at the heart of Canada’s documentary community. Hot Docs was created by DOC 30 years ago, by filmmakers, to celebrate and show their films to Canadians and the world. It’s been this kind of beating heart for a lot of us. And I think that’s why the community feels so invested in it. We’re one big family here, so it’s been really challenging and heartbreaking to see Hot Docs go through so many struggles.

In one year, their artistic director stepped down. Ten programmers stepped down. They publicly announced financial difficulties. Their president stepped down. It was one blow after the other.

But on the other hand, there’s this incredibly hardworking, dedicated team within Hot Docs that are doing everything possible to rebuild it. They’ve cut the board down to three people. They’re going to have to reflect deeply on what it means to have a community-centred festival that is going through a period of humble rebuilding.

Looking ahead, what are your hopes and expectations for the industry?

I’m an optimist. I can’t help it. It’s just the way that I approach this work. I’ve been travelling around the country a lot in the last couple years, and specifically to smaller, more regional communities, and I feel really excited and optimistic about all of the amazing projects and stories that are out there.

Documentary filmmakers have always had really innovative ways of making it work. It’s a very scrappy, survivalist group of creators. They’re there; they’re making the work. What we really want is to make sure that they’re able to be full-time, professional creators.

I want to be excited about the CRTC ruling. We’ll see what happens. We may see a bunch of new money coming into the production sector, but we’re going to need some tweaks to ensure that it comes into actually Canadian-owned companies. I’m cautiously optimistic.

I’ve always worked very communally, and that idea of just getting through it together has always informed the way that I work. I think it’s interesting to see that spirit of collective, collaborative work in the policy side of the industry. It was an exciting surprise to see how the CMPA and the ISO and BIPOC TV and Film and the REMC and AQM—all of the acronyms—came together around Bill C-11. I was also surprised at how much of a voice we can have when we really come together on some key issues.

What is it about Rex, star of the police procedural Hudson & Rex (Shaftesbury and Pope Productions), that’s set the hearts of so many viewers aflutter? It could be those soulful brown eyes, or that knowing tilt of his head. It could be Rex’s keen intelligence, which the actor who plays him seems to share. Or the fact that he also does (almost) all of his own stunts—so brave!

Rex is a German Shepherd, of course, and it’s not hard to see why the actor who plays him, Diesel vom Burgimwald, is a bona fide star: he’s got charm in spades. His co-stars love him. His public adores him.

Unbelievably, however, when his owner Sherri Davis (also the dog master and an executive producer on the show) adopted him, Diesel was considered “vicious, uncontrollable, unmanageable, untrainable.” He’d been bought from a breeder, then returned. But Davis, who has been training animals for film and television for 30 years, decided to take a chance on him.

Smart move. Diesel has played Rex from day one on Hudson & Rex, the Citytv staple (recently renewed for a seventh season) that follows the crime-fighting escapades of a police task force in St. John’s, Newfoundland. The clever canine is such an integral part of his show that it’s hard to imagine any other dog as Rex.

You’ve got to learn the animal—what they respond to, what makes them tick. That’s the main relationship. You show the animal respect, and you’ll have the best animal in the world.”

Sherri Davis

So is Diesel just a natural-born star? According to Davis, it’s all in the training, and that goes for dogs as well as horses, cats, skunks, raccoons, birds of prey—all of which she’s worked with. “It’s not any specific breed, it’s not any specific temperament. It’s the training and the time you put into the animal,” says Davis. “You’ve got to learn the animal—what they respond to, what makes them tick. That’s the main relationship. You show the animal respect, and you’ll have the best animal in the world.”

For Diesel and Davis, acting is a round-the-clock job. When Hudson & Rex is filming, they’re on set from Monday to Friday. And while Diesel spends a fair bit of on-set time in his air-conditioned trailer, getting pampered and eating doggie treats prepared by his chef, Davis is busy blocking scenes—choreographing Diesel’s movements and working with the director to get the best shot. Then she brings him on set, shows him the routine, and shooting begins. And, as every actor knows, it’s not as breezy as it looks.

“Say there’s a scene with Rex jumping out of a car and running to a house,” says Davis. “They might shoot that scene 12 times. And it’s like that with every scene. When people see the show, they don’t realize that those 42 minutes took seven whole days to shoot.”

And weekends aren’t all R&R, either. On his off days, Diesel is gearing up for the next episode, doing stunt rehearsals and other prep work, like getting accustomed to other animals he’ll be appearing alongside. (Once, when Diesel had to work with sheep for an episode, Davis accelerated the getting-to-know-you stage by moving the sheep into her home.)

“When we’re filming, it’s very intense,” says Davis. “It’s seven days a week.”

“ On set, if they yell ‘back to ones,’ Diesel just turns and goes back to his starting position. It’s no use me even being there. I’m just the driver!”

Sherri Davis

While Diesel relies on his owner’s training and commands, he’s a smart pup who can certainly hold his own on set. “On set, if they yell ‘back to ones,’ Diesel just turns and goes back to his starting position. It’s no use me even being there,” Davis laughs. “I’m just the driver!”

Diesel has also been able to soak up some of the glitz and glamour that comes from being in show biz. In 2023, he walked the pink carpet at Canneseries, the annual TV series festival held in Cannes, France. He also stole the show at this year’s Canadian Screen Awards, taking to the stage to present the Audience Choice Award with his co-star Mayko Nguyen.

“That was the highlight of my career: to be at the CSAs and have professional actors, the best in the industry, recognize Diesel as an actor,” says Davis. “The highlight of my career and probably my life.”

Diesel is not just a very good boy, but a very good actor—and, according to Davis, the choice to act is his to make.

“He’s eight now, and he will work until the day he tells me he’s not going to work. The day I open that car door, and he doesn’t jump out to go greet everybody and isn’t wagging his tail and moaning and groaning and carrying on, is the day he will retire,” she explains. “He’s the one in charge of his destiny, not me.”

Five Questions with Rex

How did you get started in show biz?

I’d been living with my owner Sherri for less than 24 hours when a producer at Shaftesbury came to meet with her. He took one look at me and said, “That’s Rex!” Sherri wasn’t sure—my last owner had labelled me vicious and untrainable—but the producer said, “You’ve trained all these other dogs, right? Train this one and I’ll be back next week with a camera.” And with that, a star was born.

What’s your favourite part of being on set?

I want to say my weekly spa treatments, which help keep my fur and paws looking sharp for my close-ups. I go into a kind of dreamworld when they start working on me, but I’m told I regularly fall asleep in the bath (oops!). When the blow dryers start, I feel like a king! The treatments really are the best—almost.

The actual best part is when I pull up to set every morning and see my co-stars and the crew. I jump out of the car, run up to everyone, and get all the head scratches and belly rubs I can handle. I have the best job in the world.

What do you get up to when you’re not filming the show?

Well, since I’m an athlete, I still have to keep training at least four times a week. Otherwise, I’m running around—the leash-free area at my house is one acre, and there’s another 10 acres we go ATVing on. I get muddy and dirty and stinky, the exact opposite of what I need to be on set!

Do you perform all of your own stunts?

Most of them! I have two nephews, Ishe and Iko, who take over when Rex needs to jump from a height any higher than 36 inches. I’m no scaredy-cat, but I am the star of the show, and those heights are just considered too risky for me to attempt.

What’s the coolest experience you’ve had?
I loved attending the CSAs and presenting the Audience Choice Award to Son of a Critch, another great Newfoundland show. But the coolest experience was probably being the first dog to be invited to the Prince of Monaco’s house. What, you haven’t been?

There have been plenty of noble beasts on screen throughout Canadian television history—

Here are some notable ones:

Danger Bay

Sea pups and dolphins and whales, oh my! This ’80s adventure series with an ecological bent centered on marine veterinarian Grant “Doc” Roberts, his two children, and the entire menagerie of the Vancouver Aquarium. The aquarium and its marine inhabitants featured in practically every 30-minute episode over the show’s six-year run.

Heartland


Among the cast of horses in this long-running ranch drama is the recently retired Stormy, a black Quarter Horse who portrayed Amy Fleming-Borden’s main horse Spartan from season one to 16. As Stormy aged, other horses began to step in for Spartan’s more athletic scenes, but a 16-season stint is quite the impressive run (or, should we say, gallop!).

The Littlest Hobo


“Maybe tomorrow I’ll wanna settle down…” This beloved series about an ownerless dog who helps people in need starred London, a German Shepherd belonging to retired baseball player Chuck Eisenmann.

Long after its mid-’60s run, the series was revived for a second run from 1979 to 1985, but still credited its canine star as London.

Due South


The spiritual forefather of Hudson & Rex, this ’90s crime comedy-drama featured two Siberian Huskies as Diefenbaker, Constable Benton Fraser’s deaf half-wolf. The second, Draco, was featured for the second half of the show’s four-season run, and became so popular that his fan mail eclipsed any of the other cast members’. (We’re sure Paul Gross took it in stride.)

Mittens and Pants


Just reading the synopsis of this live-action preschool show—baby animals doing regular things like getting hiccups and finding out what they’re good at in a town called Kibble Corners—can trigger a chorus of “awww”s. Kitten-and-puppy duo Mittens and Pants are played by eight-week-olds, and they and all of their co-stars get adopted after each season.

Of course, there is no such thing as a CanCon formula. But if there were, this ain’t it.

After graduating university, a 25-year-old Black woman, Bria McFarlane, enters her professional life with optimism and youthful energy, only to find a soul-sucking world that is overwhelmingly white, and complicated by unwritten rules and confusing corporate norms. Complicating matters is her imaginary hype girl, Black Attack, who accompanies Bria everywhere, offering honest, if not always helpful, advice.

Bria Mack Gets a Life, whose first season hits Crave this fall, will make a lot of people laugh.

Very likely, many will see themselves in Bria, the title character. It will also raise a lot of questions, chief among them: Why haven’t we seen anything like this before?

A BRIEF HISTORY OF BRIA

Mark Montefiore (left), founder and CEO of New Metric Media, loves to tell this story. In 2018, he sees a short film of Sasha Leigh Henry’s, Bitches Love Brunch, on the Facebook page of Tania Thompson, Henry’s longtime collaborator. He finds it hilarious, and he reaches out to Thompson, who puts him in touch with Henry. On their first Skype call—this was pre-pandemic, after all—Henry is in Thailand, Thompson is in Japan, and Montefiore is in the UK, and the connection is patchy at best.

“It was choppy, but I was laughing my head off at everything that was making its way through,” says Montefiore. “Sasha was just talking about regular, day-to-day stuff, but I was dying.” He asks Henry if she has any ideas for television, and she walks him through the opening scenes of what would become Bria Mack Gets a Life. Bad connection and all, Montefiore is blown away: “My God, this is brilliant,” he thinks. They decide to develop the idea together.

At the time of her call with Montefiore, Henry had written, directed and produced her share of indie films, but had never worked in television. She didn’t have a series arc planned when she started the development process with New Metric, but she wasn’t daunted. “I’m very much a ‘do what you can with what you have while you can’ type of person,” she says.

New Metric’s interest in Bria Mack shouldn’t be surprising. The company has staked its claim to authentic voice and vision atop beloved niche series like Jared Keeso’s fast-talking small-town sitcom Letterkenny and its amateur-hockey-league spinoff, Shoresy. Like those shows, Bria Mack will air in October as a Crave Original.

“We’re always looking for unique Canadian stories told by underrepresented voices that should be amplified to a mass audience,” says Justin Stockman, VP, Content Development & Programming at Bell Media (Crave’s parent company). “And with the creative force of Sasha Leigh Henry, Bria Mack Gets a Life is a show we knew we needed to get behind.” Everyone who’s come into contact with the show so far seems to feel the same way. What’s it got that everyone wants?

POWERFUL VOICE, PERSISTENT VISION

“She’s got such a quality about her that resonates with anybody” (Montefiore).

“An amazing writer and thinker” (producer Tamar Bird).

“A really extraordinary voice in Canada” (actor Preeti Torul).

“Brilliant” (Thompson).

Everyone on the Bria Mack team is united in their praise for Sasha Leigh Henry, the show’s creator, executive producer, showrunner and co-director. When you hear her speak, you begin to understand why.

She’s laid back but sharp, dishing out industry wisdom and f-bombs in equal measure.

At the time of her first call with New Metric, Bria Mack “was an idea that had been gnawing away in my brain,” says Henry. When she shared that idea with Montefiore, something bigger had a chance to be born—but Henry remains at the helm from start to finish. She gets to do her show her way, which allows for a very distinctive POV to shine through.

Henry’s collaborators call the show “audacious,” “truthful,” “pure gold” and “fucking hilarious.” The show, then, sounds a lot like Henry herself. “Bria is a very good person, just trying to get through life the way she wants to get through life,” explains Thompson, who is an executive producer on the project, “and the world around her wants her to conform. I think that Sasha’s brilliance was knowing that to make your way through life like that is hard. You kind of do need a hype girl or a hype guy.”

“They actually asked us to validate that, and we found that 63 per cent of the women who are currently working in STEM were inspired by her,” confirms Di Nonno.

It’s possible that, as a newcomer to the TV industry, one of Henry’s chief strengths is her Bria-like ability to shut out all the noise about “broadest appeal” and “audience realities,” and resist any pressure to make her show fit someone else’s idea of what her show should look like.

“We need to give audiences more credit,” says Henry, bemoaning the lack of risk taking in Canadian television— and the tendency to view series like Schitt’s Creek and Kim’s Convenience as odds beaters, instead of the standard at which we could be making all shows. “Like, here’s something: why don’t we try it? Especially in comedy: comedy is our jam. Comedy is something in which we have always stood out, especially against the constant juggernaut that is American media.”

ITS OWN HYPE SQUAD

Henry may be its driving force, but Bria Mack is hardly a solo endeavour. The crew is stacked from top to bottom with people who want to see it succeed as much as Henry does—and are filled with the same determined optimism as Bria (and Henry) herself. “To the degree that the show is groundbreaking, which of course we believe it is, it’s not just the content of the show, but it is definitely how the show was made,” says

Thompson. “I just think about how many people of colour were on that crew, how many female crew members were heads of departments, and how pleasant that set was to be on—on a tight budget and under all the constraints of being first-timers, as a lot of people were. It was a spectacularly run show.”

To Thompson’s point, the show was created largely by Black women, from Henry and her co-director Kelly Fyffe Marshall to producers Tamar Bird and Angelique Knights and co-producer Jessica Meya. They’re rightfully proud of this fact.

“This show delivered and showcased brilliant, brilliant people. More so, it showcased brilliant women,” says Bird. “And the world tells us that we can’t come together and lead. I think we crushed that.”

Angelique Knights (right) had done time in marketing and acquisitions at various Canadian networks when she met Montefiore in 2021. Da Kink in My Hair, Global’s Caribbean-Canadian hair-salon sitcom, had resonated with her household when she was growing up—but that was 15 years ago. Knights had a strong sense that the Canadian television landscape was missing valuable voices, particularly Black voices. As a huge fan of Letterkenny, she began to pitch ideas to Montefiore (“If he’s making this show, there’s got to be other shows that he sees the potential in”), and he eventually showed her New Metric’s slate. Bria Mack Gets a Life jumped out immediately, and she was taken on as the show’s creative producer.

Actor Preeti Torul (left), who plays Ami Kennedy, Bria’s best work friend and only coworker of colour, believes the show is important too. She appreciated the chance to play a “human character,” instead of a stereotype or a model minority. “In this industry, I’m always South Asian first. In Bria Mack, my character gets to be flawed and funny, too,” she says.

From the crew to the production company to the broadcast partner (“Bell is an incredible supporter of fearless content, and we knew that they would get it and not try and change the whole thing,” says Montefiore), Bria Mack has an army marching lockstep behind it, intent on bringing Canada something it’s never seen before.

THE UNIVERSAL IN THE PARTICULAR

If Bria Mack soars the way the Bria Mack team believe and hope it will, yes, its success will be thanks to Sasha Leigh Henry’s irresistible POV and a stellar team who was passionate about bringing it into the world. But its success will also be largely due to its ability to reach an audience—Black Canadians between the ages of 25 and 35, particularly women—that has been underserved and basically ignored for far too long.

“Good on New Metric for doing a risky show from the POV of a Black storyteller and through the eyes of a young Black woman in Toronto, which has barely been done in Canadian television,” says Torul. “Even though that shouldn’t be risky.”

It shouldn’t be, and perhaps Bria Mack will prove that it doesn’t need to be. As Knights points out, there are large swaths of Canada’s TV-watching public that rarely, if ever, get to see themselves or their communities on screen. Why should they have to turn to American shows for that?

“Canadians want to see Canadians on screen, especially Black Canadians,” Knights insists.

Of course, having a specific audience in mind needn’t limit the show’s reach. (Does Letterkenny only appeal to hicks, skids and jocks?) As Thompson points out, “Sometimes it’s more fun if you know absolutely nothing about the experience you’re watching. Because then you feel like you’re learning something, or you’ve got a porthole into, for example, mid-thirties women and their sex lives in New York.”

For her part, Henry believes her show has “huge international potential” for two reasons: one, the idea of being “the other” in any space, which “has impact for tons of different marginalized people or people that feel sidelined.” Two, a prominent theme in the show is the tension between the relentless productivity the workplace demands of us and the quality of life we want to enjoy.

“Apparently people in Tanzania are happy, so maybe they’ve figured out a way to do it better,” she jokes. “But it’s something people everywhere else can relate to.”

She may like to make do with what she’s got, but if the show gets renewed after season one, Henry won’t be caught unprepared. “I definitely have ideas for season two, season three, even season four,” she says. But she also recognizes that, in some ways, Bria Mack will have to find her own way, and her own audience, out there in the cruel world.

“Bria Mack will take on its own life as we go, and we’ll see where it goes from there,” she says.

You can bet the show’s hype squad will be cheering it the whole way.

BAND OF BROADCASTERS

When a coalition of Canadian broadcasters announced at the Banff World Media Festival in June 2023 that they were banding together to tackle environmental sustainability in the screen sector, producers were surprised—but not unpleasantly so.

Marsha Newbery, who is Senior Director of Sustainability and Business Affairs at Thunderbird Entertainment, is passionate about climate action in her industry. “Climate change is a massive issue—perhaps the biggest issue that is being faced globally—and big problems can only be solved through collaborating,” she says. “The fact that the broadcasters are going to collaborate as a group on sustainability initiatives, to develop a unified approach, is very welcome. It’s the right move, and it’s an inspiring move.”

The coalition was spearheaded by the CBC, which rolled out its Greening Our Story environmental strategy in 2021. The strategy includes commitments to reducing carbon and lowering energy consumption, as well as folding sustainability into its procurement practices (all original CBC productions with budgets over $400,000 must use the albert carbon calculator to track their emissions).

Lisa Clarkson, Executive Director of Business & Rights and Production Sustainability at the CBC, says that after the launch of Greening Our Story and a string of industry sustainability events, she was fielding calls from other broadcasters who were curious about the strategy and how it worked on the ground. That was the seed for the Canadian Broadcasters for Sustainability initiative, and it would soon germinate. A growing group of broadcasters began to meet to discuss the possibility of collaboration.

The degree of cooperation—the coalition is currently comprised of 22 broadcasters—is striking. As Clarkson puts it, “There’s never been a group of broadcasters of this size and scope that has come together in the history of our Canadian industry to tackle a shared challenge. Never.” She is similarly forceful when speaking about why the group felt the need to collaborate in the first place: “At no time has it ever been more critical—ever—for the health of the planet.”

The group is made up of broadcasters of varying sizes, both public and private, and has representatives from both the French- and English-language markets. The broadcasters are also at varying stages of their sustainability journeys.

Cara Nye works at small accessibility-focused channel AMI-tv, where she is Director of Content and Development. She admits that when AMI-tv was approached to join the coalition, her first thought was, “We recycle. What’s the big deal?” She laughs about this now. “I was really, really naïve,” she says. “And as I started participating in the meetings, I started to get really excited and proud to be a part of this.”

Nye is able to take what the CBC and other larger broadcasters have already implemented and apply their learnings to her own network. The sharing of learnings is one of the initiative’s greatest advantages, and it stands to accelerate the greening of the screen industry (Nye says that AMI-tv will be moving toward use of the albert carbon calculator in due course).

This is not to say that AMI-tv doesn’t have its own learnings to pass on. Nye notes that the small budgets her network operates with have made her especially attuned to the bottom line, and aware of how greener choices—using electric cars, reducing catering waste, eliminating single-use plastics—can actually cut costs in the long run. She looks forward to sharing this arithmetic with producers.

WHAT WILL IT MEAN FOR PRODUCERS?

Producers may applaud the broadcaster initiative, and at the same time wonder what the initiative could mean for them in terms of sustainability requirements. Will every broadcaster require the use of the albert carbon calculator for every production, no matter the size? Will sustainability requirements become uniform and potentially overwhelming, particularly for a small production company?

Blue Ant is a member of the coalition, and an interesting case study: the company operates two units, one for broadcasting (channels like Cottage Life and T+E) and one for production. Julie Chang, Blue Ant’s EVP of Business Strategy and Co-Productions, says that because it understands the needs of both businesses, “when we speak as a broadcaster, we aim to do so thoughtfully.” That includes its contributions to the Canadian Broadcasters for Sustainability group.

“Every single production is a unique snowflake,” says Chang, noting that its ability to achieve sustainability is affected by many factors—program type, budget, company size, location. “We discuss all of that internally, and it’s that knowledge that we share to the larger broadcast group.” (In other words, Blue Ant’s got your back, producers.)

Marsha Newbery at Thunderbird is hopeful that the broadcaster group will be collaborative not only with each other, but with their producer partners, “particularly on any policy change or contractual change that would require downloading of obligation on producers.” She points out that producers are “master problem solvers” and the experts on their productions: “We’re going to move faster and more effectively together, so if there’s something that involves producers, I hope they’ll talk to us about it. We’ll be very willing partners. Climate change is so urgent that we can’t really lose time.”

For her part, the CBC’s Lisa Clarkson says that the BANFF announcement was a first step, and that communicating the coalition’s actions and progress with the rest of the industry, particularly producers, is “a very high priority.” The group has yet to determine what form that communication will take, but she’s confident they’ll figure it out quickly.

Chang, at Blue Ant, understands that any new sustainability requirement, whether or not it’s developed in consultation with the production community, might meet with some natural resistance on the part of producers. But, over time, “it will become muscle memory,” she believes.

MORE GREEN ON SCREEN

Newbery feels strongly that producers “can care about two things at the same time”: they can be responsible about budgets, and can also be invested in taking climate action on their productions. Let’s add a third thing: looking out for new business opportunities.

Referring to the fourth goal of Canadian Broadcasters for Sustainability (see following page), Newbery brings up one benefit of the broadcaster initiative that a non-producer might overlook—a bigger market for sustainable content. “That would be a positive development,” she says. “And if development executives see interest in that sort of content, they’ll go looking for it.”

This ripple effect can only mean more opportunities for producers to pitch green content—and, from there, a more informed public and, ideally, a cleaner, greener planet. Who could argue with that?

Now in their 18th year, the Indiescreen Awards celebrate Canada’s most outstanding and most promising independent feature film producers. Nominees for the Established Producer Award are recognized for their collective body of work, as well as their contribution to the reputation of Canadian cinema on the world stage. Nominees for the Kevin Tierney Emerging Producer Award are recognized for inspirational work, demonstrating promise of a bright career ahead as a Canadian independent feature film producer.

Established Producer Award

Tanya Brunel

Companies: Logical Mayhem, Rezolution Pictures

Qualifying film: Coming Home (Wanna Icipus Kupi)

Tanya Brunel is an award-winning Métis producer from the Red River region in Manitoba. She has been developing and producing motion picture, television and digital media content with a focus on Indigenous stories since 2001. Her recent project Coming Home (Wanna Icipus Kupi) reveals impacts of the Sixties Scoop, Indigenous resilience and narrative sovereignty.

Niv Fichman, Fraser Ash, Kevin Krikst

Company: Rhombus Media

Qualifying film: BlackBerry

Co-founded by Niv Fichman in 1979, Rhombus Media has released over 200 feature films and television projects, receiving hundreds of awards at home and abroad. Since joining the Rhombus team over 15 years ago, Kevin Krikst and Fraser Ash have shepherded a number of Rhombus projects, including the recently released BlackBerry, which has seen both critical and commercial success.

Nancy Grant

Company: Metafilms

Qualifying film: Simple Comme Sylvain (The Nature of Love)

Nancy Grant joined Metafilms in 2008 and has produced several award-winning shorts and feature films. Her recent film Simple Comme Sylvain (The Nature of Love) premiered at Un Certain Regard at the Cannes Film Festival in 2023.

Jason Levangie, Marc Tetreault

Company: Shut Up & Colour Pictures

Qualifying film: The Queen of My Dreams

Shut Up & Colour Pictures, based in Nova Scotia, develops and produces feature films, special projects and television. The company has produced six features, and their latest film, The Queen of My Dreams, is set to premiere at TIFF 2023.

William Woods, Allison White

Companies: Woods Entertainment, Sara Fost Pictures

Qualifying film: The King Tide

William Woods is the founder and co-president of Game Theory Films, a boutique distribution company. Allison White is an award-winning producer whose career began with Cast No Shadow, which was nominated for four Canadian Screen Awards, including Best Motion Picture. Their latest collaboration, The King Tide, will premiere at TIFF 2023.

Kevin Tierney Emerging Producer Award

Anam Abbas

Companies: Other Memory Media, Citylights Media

Qualifying film: In Flames

Award-winning Pakistani and Canadian filmmaker Anam Abbas runs Other Memory Media. Her first feature, Showgirls of Pakistan, released globally by VICE in 2021, amassed over 1.2 million views. Her first fiction feature, In Flames, had its world premiere at Directors’ Fortnight at the Cannes Film Festival 2023 and will have its North American premiere at TIFF 2023.

Michael Tanko Grand

Companies: Grand Scheme Productions, 666 Films Inc

Qualifying film: Satan Wants You

Michael Tanko Grand has produced three feature documentaries including Satan Wants You, which had its world premiere at SXSW 2023 and its Canadian premiere at Hot Docs 2023. Michael is also known for Finding Big Country and Abandoned, and for consulting on the controversial breakthrough miniseries Surviving R. Kelly.

Alona Metzer

Company: Leilani Films

Qualifying film: Backspot

Alona Metzer is a Toronto-based producer whose passion lies in collaborating to create work that sits at the intersection of art and entertainment. Her debut feature, Learn to Swim, was selected as one of TIFF Canada’s Top Ten films in 2021. Her most recent film, Backspot, will have its world premiere at TIFF 2023.

Sean O’Neill

Company: Visitor Media

Qualifying film: Swan Song

Sean O’Neill is a producer, writer and director, who founded Visitor Media in 2022. Sean co-created, executive produced and hosted the award-winning CBC Arts documentary series In the Making, which brought viewers inside the lives and work of leading artists at pivotal moments of creation. Swan Song will have its world premiere at TIFF 2023.

Andria Wilson Mirza

Company: Baby Daal Productions

Qualifying film: The Queen of My Dreams

Andria is the Director of ReFrame, Hollywood’s gender equity coalition founded by Sundance Institute and Women In Film (WIF). With her wife, writer/director Fawzia Mirza, Andria runs Baby Daal Productions. The company’s most recent feature, The Queen of My Dreams, a Pakistan–Canada co-production, is set to premiere at TIFF 2023.

Just over a decade ago, France found itself in a sticky predicament. Known for prizing its national culture, the government planned to digitize and restore 1,000 French films, to preserve them for future distribution and prevent them from vanishing into the past.

The plan hit an unexpected roadblock. It turned out that the material assets of all of the French feature films coproduced with major American studios in the ’70s and ’80s—films starring screen legends like Jean-Paul Belmondo and Catherine Deneuve—were in the hands of those studios, languishing on crammed shelves in California storage lockers. The studios told the French stakeholders that digitizing the films wasn’t a priority, and that was that.

“It was a grotesque situation,” says Jérôme Dechesne of France’s producers’ union, the Union syndicale de la production audiovisuelle (USPA). “Assets for French films that we had hoped to preserve were now out of reach to us. It was a shocking realization for all French stakeholders.”

France had learned the hard way that only France could be counted on to protect its cultural heritage. Fast forward 10 years to 2021, when France put its stake in the ground with the introduction of the Services de medias audiovisuels à la demande (SMAD) decree—which compels all international SVOD platforms operating in France to invest a percentage of their French revenues into local production, just as French television channels have long had to do.

Sound familiar? The French experience has many parallels to Canada’s own efforts to regulate global streaming services, but since France is further along in its journey, it’s worth highlighting several areas where we might follow its example (or simply take heart that the battle is not in vain).

Investing in independent

In France, L’Autorité de régulation de la communication audiovisuelle et numérique (Arcom)—the French counterpart to our CRTC—oversees the implementation of the SMAD decree, which stipulates that on-demand streaming services must invest at least 20 per cent of their annual gross revenues earned in France to financing French or European TV or film content (split 80/20 between TV and film, respectively). And this is on top of a 5.15 per cent tax already charged to streamers and other international platforms, including YouTube, to contribute to the audiovisual support fund run by the Centre national du cinema et de l’image animée (CNC).

It gets more specific, with investment to be allocated across a variety of audiovisual works (drama, animation, documentaries) and feature films, depending on the platform’s focus. As well, at least two thirds of the investment in TV must be funnelled into independent production.

While France is not the only European country to have production obligations in place for foreign streamers, its investment targets are higher than most. The result? The streamers’ audiovisual expenditures in France in 2023 have reached the equivalent of C$432 million, with spinoff benefits reaching nearly $1.5 billion.

IP retention or bust

One of the SMAD decree’s fundamental principles is protecting the IP of French creators, and it accomplishes this in a clever way: first, as noted above, by insisting that a large percentage of investment goes toward independent production (where the streaming platform has no shareholding interest), and second, by refusing to allow streamers to hold rights in perpetuity.

What is notable is that the streamers can only hold the rights to an independent production for a maximum of six years, and exclusive rights for three years. If a streamer wants to maintain the rights, they must actively renew them under specific terms. This allows companies like Netflix—which places exclusivity at the centre of its business model and “lobbied the government hard” over the issue, according to Dechesne at the USPA—to have it their way, but only for so long.

Critically, this principle “allows French producers to be the decision makers. This can lead to spinoff opportunities, adaptations, format sales and new revenue,” says Dechesne. “Moreover, it allows all rightsholders—including co-producers, writers, actors, et cetera—an opportunity to also realize additional revenue from these renewals, in a virtuous circle.”

After the kicking and screaming, peace

Nobody involved would say negotiating with the streamers was a walk in the park, with foreign companies chafing especially at the obligation to invest in independent French-language works. But the French stakeholders respected their own right to be at the negotiating table, and fought the impulse to water down their ambitious goals.

That was then. The dust has settled, and the system now seems to be humming along quite nicely.

“Particularly at the time of the establishment of the SMAD decree, there were threats—or grave concerns— on the part of many players. Today, two or three years later, these concerns have been swept away and we are in the process of undertaking new interprofessional negotiations,” says Dechesne.

To see France on the other side of its own legislative upheaval, smiling and in good health, is a bracing reminder to our own lawmakers and stakeholders to stay the course. Aim high. And insist on independence.

“When we don’t look at who is behind the camera… we’re taking for granted the fact that the narrative is culturally a singular narrative that is not representative of the total Canadian population.”

This year’s WIVOS Report is its seventh iteration, having led the charge in national on-screen equity reporting in its previous six reports. “Data is hugely influential in addressing change,” says Jan Miller, board member of Women in View. Miller is also part of the WIFT (Women in Film and Television) Canada Coalition, as well as a founding member of the National Screen Institute of Canada (NSI).

“Each time the report came out, it influenced change. What started to happen was other agencies started to recognize the value of the numbers and the value of the statistics. And so they began their own reporting,” she reveals.

Key research points in previous reports include the monetary investment in women’s stories, the percentage of films produced by women, and— of that percentage how many were produced by white women versus Black or Indigenous women. Positive change started to trend as a result.

But if the findings indicate a trend toward less equity in the industry, does the industry call itself out for not doing the work? And if so, how do we move forward?

Tonya Williams has been doing that work with Reelworld Screen Institute for 23 years. The Toronto-based not-for-profit’s mission is “to advance opportunities for Canadians who are Black, Indigenous, Asian, South Asian, and People of Colour in the screen industries by providing professional development and advocating for racial equity in Canadian content and production.”

Reelworld is just now releasing the BIPOC protocols guideline for addressing the depiction of Black, Indigenous, Asian and women of colour in Canadian screen content. The research project informing the protocol guideline is called Her Frame Matters.

Williams, who played Dr. Olivia Winters on The Young and the Restless from 1990 to 2012, continually noticed she was the only Black person in a room at any given time—in drama school, at auditions, at roundtable discussions.

“All of these instances reinforced to me that, ‘You are an anomaly to the rule,’” Williams says. “It’d be an audition filled with white people and I was the only Black person. So I pretty much felt the confidence that I was getting the role of the Black person.”

Safia Abdigir, a researcher for Her Frame Matters, says they wanted to collect the data, look at historical depictions of BIPOC women, and then create best practices and an outline on ways to move forward.

“When we are requesting shifts in the industry, the ‘why’ is asked,” says Abdigir.

“Having the data and research is important to be able to prove it and to show exactly the issues that we’re dealing with. If we’re not really specific about what the issues are, we can’t really be specific about moving forward in terms of recommendations.”

On Her Frame Matters, Reelworld conducted content analysis on a combination of films and TV series on their depictions of women, including what the roles were, how long they were on screen, whether they pushed the plotline forward, their role in the story, and particular ways in which they were sexualized or not sexualized.

What all three institutes have in common is threading together the story that data and research tell.

“I’m looking forward to the phase where we get down to the really hard work of recognizing all the systemic problems in the entire structure of our industry,” says Williams, “and how we can, slowly, over the next 20 years, create a strategic plan, where we can see the data means things are improving or not improving.”

For Di Nonno and the work done at the Geena Davis Institute, women seeing themselves represented is key—and now they have the data to back it up.

“We want to see ourselves in the stories that we’re watching. When we see ourselves, we get the message that, well, maybe I can do that. For example, in Hidden Figures… all of those young Black girls seeing that story and saying, ‘Wow, you know, I could send somebody to the moon!’” she says.

In fact, one of the institute’s 58 key findings includes a data point that proves just that. It’s called the Scully Effect, referencing the character of Dana Scully from The X-Files, played by actor Gillian Anderson.

“They actually asked us to validate that, and we found that 63 per cent of the women who are currently working in STEM were inspired by her,” confirms Di Nonno.

“That’s amazing. That’s real-world impact.”

France Martin hasn’t been on the job very long—she assumed the role of Executive Director of the Youth Media Alliance (YMA) in April 2023. She’s also a newcomer to the screen industry, though she comes armed with plenty of executive experience in the non-profit sector, leading organizations from the Canadian Kinesiology Alliance to the Fondation des Offices jeunesse internationaux du Québec.

Still, she didn’t need much time to recognize that “change” is the watchword for Canada’s media industry in general, and youth media industry in particular. Seismic platform shifts. Bill C-11. The double-edged promise of AI.

“The industry is going through major transformation,” Martin says. “Just think of the outstanding quantities of new material now available to children. How can creators and producers make something that stands out from the group and gets selected by children or their parents?”

At YMA, it’s Martin’s mission to help producers do just that. Through advocacy, scholarship funds, an awards gala, and lowering barriers to access for different festivals, YMA is committed to ensuring that quality Canadian children’s content continues to get made.

To be sure, the obstacles are myriad. Martin mentions the crowded field of distribution channels, from traditional broadcasters to streamers to platforms like YouTube and TikTok. Says Martin, “We’re faced with the challenge of making sure there is Canadian content on streaming services, for example. And how do we get streamers involved in our associations and our industry and with our stakeholders?”

One way she is tackling this specific challenge is by assuming the role of a host at a party: doing her best to ensure that everyone knows everyone else. “We make sure that we’re in touch with the big names, and in turn, we put them in touch with our producers,” she says. This is the first step toward filling the production pipeline with high-quality kids’ content.

And while Martin sees geographical boundaries dissolving in the way that shows get produced— she mentions, as an example, a Montreal producer who’s making a series with a team assembled from three separate countries— YMA is dedicated to supporting the production of distinctly Canadian content.

“We are a Canadian organization,” she says, “and our priority is helping Canadian creators.”

In the short time she’s been at the helm of YMA, it seems Martin has already developed a key focus: improving access to content for children. This means bringing the content to the audience, rather than the audience to the content, and making that content visible around every corner, from YouTube to traditional TV.

“The best strategy is to be on many platforms at a time,” says Martin. “If I were to define success in five to seven years, it would be that whatever is produced, children and families are accessing it in as many ways as possible, for their entertainment and their education.”

Of course, in such a rapidly changing environment, it’s hard to make predictions about the next five months, let alone the next five years. It’s a thought that energizes Martin: “There’s major transformation coming along, and we are adjusting as we go. There is so much creativity and positivity in our sector, and so many new technologies, from animation to live action to video games. I think that’s fabulous. And in five or seven years, we can have this discussion again, and we’ll look back and say, ‘Wow. Where were we way back then?’

“This industry can go as far as it wants.”